|
Peyton Manning - ALL time leading BABY
|
lving_42day
Rookie
 
Posts: 12
Group: Registered
Joined: Dec 2007
Status:
Offline
Reputation: 1
vBux: $118
|
RE: Peyton Manning - ALL time leading BABY
Nothing in Kemp's original post has shown that as the title states, "Peyton Manning - ALL time leading BABY."
1) The only thing remotely close to calling Manning a baby at all was the remark on Peyton crying to the refs, which by the way, every single QB does that, well any good QB who gives two craps about his team's success. Show a little less bias please. Tom Brady, Philip Rivers, my fav Ben Rothlisberger, etc, etc, every single one of them, as you say "whine" to the refs about certain calls and non-calls. I have seen all of the aforementioned quarterbacks, especially etc (that guy is a competive sum of a gun, that durn etc guy), give their receivers exasperated looks when the play is a bust. Did you watch Brady in the Super Bowl? He threw one of receivers a ball that was way over his head on the sidelines, and then there Brady went, screaming at the receiver and waving his arms around. Not the receiver's fault he is not 10 ft tall.
2) If you want to try to claim 'ALL time leading BABY,' then there's a little thing you have to look at called his consecutive games starting streak. 10 yrs straight he has started every single game. It takes some kind of toughness to get back on the field after getting sacked a buncha times and taking the hits a QB takes while playing. Right behind him is Tom Brady, who has not missed one game since he became the starter in 2001. There are some really mentally and physically weak players who have played the game, and that's just in my time watching football. Steve Young was getting injured quite often, and would rarely, if ever, play hurt. Troy Aikman was getting concussions left and right, from some pretty weak hits, I might add. Now that has got to put them a little more in the running for 'ALL time leading BABY.' And that is just the upper teir of the 1990's. What about Ryan Leaf? What about Chad Pennington, for crying out loud?
That's all I am saying. don't be so biased. BTW, what's up with the Giants, namely a Eli Manning, taking away that guaranteed victory every1 thought the Patriots had? Seems that ur gonna need to really reevaluate your choice of a name "Manning is a choke-both of them." Seems that to me that if a QB can get to the Super Bowl and win it, which now both Mannings have done, they can't really be classified as a "choke." Marino is the biggest name on the list for good QBs who never made it to the Big Game. Elway made it to three Super Bowls from 1987 thru 1990 but got beat badly in all of them b4 he actually won one.
So please, don't just go off an emotional reaction because you didn't like watching the Colts beat the Pats last year. I don't like watching the Colts beat my Steelers either, but it happens. I am not gonna hate on Peyton because he got it done when my team couldn't. BTW, you should feel a little better since the Pats did squeak out a win against them this year. But basing this 'Biggest Baby' stuff on pure emotion, not on facts, is just not realistic.
|
|
| 02-05-2008 06:30 PM |
|
|
chatterbox79
Rookie
 
Posts: 5
Group: Registered
Joined: Feb 2008
Status:
Offline
Reputation: 0
vBux: $106
|
RE: Peyton Manning - ALL time leading BABY
Lol are you effing blind? All the penalties were legit, they reply penalties on the jumbo-tron and they were penalties. And if your gonna say sh*t about Peyton Manning, talk about Phillip Rivers being a poor sport, he went to one of the crowd members and flicked him off for beating the Colts.
i hope rivers got an earfull from his coach. he's got some growing up to do.
|
|
| 02-07-2008 06:47 AM |
|
 |
YoureaPuppy
Rookie
 
Posts: 13
Group: Registered
Joined: Aug 2007
Status:
Offline
Reputation: 0
vBux: $119
|
RE: Peyton Manning - ALL time leading BABY
I don't really understand what's the problem with the Pats lost!!! don't you guys get it they just loss one of nineteen games...
Some said that it doesn't matter they were 18-1 because they loss the most important game.. but do you think that if they face once again the Giants, will them has the same luck... so simple the Giants are not at the Pats level
|
|
| 02-07-2008 11:35 PM |
|
 |
lving_42day
Rookie
 
Posts: 12
Group: Registered
Joined: Dec 2007
Status:
Offline
Reputation: 1
vBux: $118
|
RE: Peyton Manning - ALL time leading BABY
Ahhh.....but the problem is, you don't understand. An 18-1 season is not unprecedented. Let me share some knowledge with you. The 18-1 record which was achieved by the Patriots has been preceded by two other teams since the regular season became 16 games long. Except, since the Patriots did become the first team to go 16-0, that would mean that the other teams who went 18-1 did it by winning the Super Bowl. The two teams are the 1984 SF 49ers and the 1985 Chicago Bears. And then, there is the team that did not lose a single game, the '72 Dolphins. So, in comparison, the Patriots season falls short of the '84 SF 49ers, '85 Bears and the '72 Dolphins. In my belief, regardless of the performance of a team up to a Super Bowl, it doesn't count for much if they don't win the Super Bowl. I would say that any other team who has won the Super Bowl had a better season than that of the '07 Patriots. This would include the 01', 03', and '04 Patriots.
That's all I got to say about that.
|
|
| 02-08-2008 02:54 AM |
|
 |
|
|
|
|